Comments on: TravelPod Search Sorting http://blog.travelpod.com/2008/01/18/travelpod-search-sorting/ The Web's Original Travel Blog Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:47:08 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: David http://blog.travelpod.com/2008/01/18/travelpod-search-sorting/#comment-129 David Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:39:22 +0000 http://blog.travelpod.com/2008/01/18/travelpod-search-sorting/#comment-129 Hi I do have one other thought on the search. At the bottom of each blog, it shows stories for that city. I look at these but would find it far more useful if it showed the latest stories, rather than from a few years ago. Just a thought David Hi

I do have one other thought on the search. At the bottom of each blog, it shows stories for that city. I look at these but would find it far more useful if it showed the latest stories, rather than from a few years ago.

Just a thought

David

]]> By: shaunmcquaker http://blog.travelpod.com/2008/01/18/travelpod-search-sorting/#comment-123 shaunmcquaker Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:07:14 +0000 http://blog.travelpod.com/2008/01/18/travelpod-search-sorting/#comment-123 Glad to hear you like the date sorting David. The quality metric is a little trickier for sure. It takes a few things into consideration, including overall trip score rating. You do have a valid point though that the number of ratings is relevant and it should probably be included in some way. We'll take this into consideration. Cheers, Shaun Glad to hear you like the date sorting David. The quality metric is a little trickier for sure. It takes a few things into consideration, including overall trip score rating. You do have a valid point though that the number of ratings is relevant and it should probably be included in some way. We’ll take this into consideration.

Cheers,
Shaun

]]> By: David http://blog.travelpod.com/2008/01/18/travelpod-search-sorting/#comment-119 David Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:13:26 +0000 http://blog.travelpod.com/2008/01/18/travelpod-search-sorting/#comment-119 Hi Just been looking at your search feature and really, to sort by quality is a bit misleading. If someone has posted a couple of entries, had one rating of 5, whilst another person has 300 entries and has had some ratings of 1 out of say 100 ratings, who realistically has more quality? Not a very good way of stating quality now. But I do like the sort by date feature. David Hi

Just been looking at your search feature and really, to sort by quality is a bit misleading. If someone has posted a couple of entries, had one rating of 5, whilst another person has 300 entries and has had some ratings of 1 out of say 100 ratings, who realistically has more quality? Not a very good way of stating quality now. But I do like the sort by date feature.

David

]]>